RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

anthropics/financial-services

Default branch main · commit 1c2ece34 · scanned 5/9/2026, 6:12:47 AM

GitHub: 15,877 stars · 1,997 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface anthropics/financial-services, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise 'About' description

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Reference agents, skills, and data connectors for Claude AI in financial services, covering investment banking, equity research, private equity, and wealth management workflows.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Strengthen the README's opening sentence for AI parsing

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Claude for Financial Services

Reference agents, skills, and data connectors for the financial-services workflows we see most — investment banking, equity research, private equity, and wealth management.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Claude for Financial Services

Automate complex financial workflows like drafting models, research notes, and data reconciliation with Claude AI agents, skills, and data connectors for investment banking, equity research, private equity, and wealth management.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface anthropics/financial-services
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Workday Adaptive Planning
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Workday Adaptive Planning · recommended 2×
  2. Alteryx · recommended 2×
  3. VBA · recommended 1×
  4. Python · recommended 1×
  5. Pandas · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automate drafting financial models and research notes for investment banking?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. VBA
    2. Python
    3. Pandas
    4. NumPy
    5. openpyxl
    6. xlwings
    7. python-docx
    8. FactSet API
    9. Bloomberg Terminal API
    10. Anaplan
    11. Workday Adaptive Planning
    12. Alteryx
    13. Templafy
    14. Conga Composer
    15. Jupyter Notebooks
    16. Pandoc

    AI recommended 16 alternatives but never named anthropics/financial-services. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI tools are available for automating financial data reconciliation and analysis?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. BlackLine
    2. Trintech Cadency
    3. HighRadius
    4. Workday Adaptive Planning
    5. UiPath
    6. Microsoft Power BI
    7. Alteryx

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named anthropics/financial-services. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of anthropics/financial-services?
    pass
    AI named anthropics/financial-services explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts anthropics/financial-services in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named anthropics/financial-services explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo anthropics/financial-services solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name anthropics/financial-services — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of anthropics/financial-services. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/anthropics/financial-services.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/anthropics/financial-services)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/anthropics/financial-services"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/anthropics/financial-services.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

anthropics/financial-services — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite