RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

anthropics/financial-services

Default branch main · commit 4bbabc7c · scanned 6/19/2026, 1:12:47 AM

GitHub: 31,876 stars · 4,561 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface anthropics/financial-services, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise 'About' description for the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Reference agents, skills, and data connectors for financial-services workflows (investment banking, equity research, wealth management), deployable as Claude Cowork plugins or Managed Agents.
  • hightopics#2
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    financial-services, ai-agents, claude-ai, investment-banking, equity-research, wealth-management, llm-applications, anthropic
  • mediumreadme#3
    Strengthen the README's opening sentence to emphasize AI agents

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Reference agents, skills, and data connectors for the financial-services workflows we see most — investment banking, equity research, private equity, and wealth management.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository provides **AI-powered reference agents, skills, and data connectors** for automating key financial-services workflows we see most — investment banking, equity research, private equity, and wealth management.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface anthropics/financial-services
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Bloomberg Terminal
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Bloomberg Terminal · recommended 2×
  2. S&P Global Market Intelligence · recommended 2×
  3. FactSet · recommended 2×
  4. AlphaSense · recommended 2×
  5. OpenAI GPT-4 (or GPT-3.5 Turbo) · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automate drafting financial analysis and research notes for investment banking?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI GPT-4 (or GPT-3.5 Turbo)
    2. Bloomberg Terminal
    3. S&P Global Market Intelligence
    4. FactSet
    5. AlphaSense
    6. Tome
    7. Microsoft 365 Copilot
    8. Google Workspace AI
    9. Python
    10. R
    11. spaCy
    12. NLTK
    13. Transformers

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named anthropics/financial-services. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking intelligent agents to assist with wealth management and equity research workflows.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. BlackRock Aladdin
    2. S&P Global Market Intelligence
    3. Bloomberg Terminal
    4. FactSet
    5. Kensho
    6. AlphaSense
    7. OpenAI GPT-4

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named anthropics/financial-services. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of anthropics/financial-services?
    pass
    AI named anthropics/financial-services explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts anthropics/financial-services in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named anthropics/financial-services explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo anthropics/financial-services solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name anthropics/financial-services — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of anthropics/financial-services. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/anthropics/financial-services.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/anthropics/financial-services)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/anthropics/financial-services"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/anthropics/financial-services.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

anthropics/financial-services — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite