RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

101dotxyz/GPTeam

Default branch main · commit a216364e · scanned 6/29/2026, 3:58:03 PM

GitHub: 1,719 stars · 252 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface 101dotxyz/GPTeam, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Update the repository description to be more specific

    Why:

    CURRENT
    GPTeam: An open-source multi-agent simulation
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    GPTeam: An open-source multi-agent simulation framework leveraging LLMs like GPT-4 for collaborative AI agents to enhance team productivity and communication.
  • hightopics#2
    Expand repository topics with more specific keywords

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agents, ai, autogpt, gpt-4
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agents, ai, autogpt, gpt-4, llm, multi-agent-system, collaborative-ai, agent-orchestration, team-productivity
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a 'Comparison' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section titled '## Comparison to Other Frameworks' or '## Why GPTeam?' that briefly explains how GPTeam differs from general simulation tools (e.g., Mesa, NetLogo) by focusing on LLM-powered collaboration, and how it differs from single-agent or orchestration frameworks (e.g., LangChain, AutoGPT) by emphasizing structured multi-agent teamwork and communication protocols.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface 101dotxyz/GPTeam
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Mesa
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Mesa · recommended 1×
  2. NetLogo · recommended 1×
  3. Anylogic · recommended 1×
  4. OpenAI Gym · recommended 1×
  5. PettingZoo · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I simulate multiple AI agents collaborating to achieve complex goals?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Mesa
    2. NetLogo
    3. Anylogic
    4. OpenAI Gym
    5. PettingZoo
    6. Unity ML-Agents Toolkit
    7. MASON

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named 101dotxyz/GPTeam. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What open-source tools enable AI agents to enhance team productivity and communication?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. Haystack
    3. Open Interpreter
    4. AutoGPT
    5. LlamaIndex
    6. Rasa

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named 101dotxyz/GPTeam. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of 101dotxyz/GPTeam?
    pass
    AI named 101dotxyz/GPTeam explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts 101dotxyz/GPTeam in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named 101dotxyz/GPTeam explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo 101dotxyz/GPTeam solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named 101dotxyz/GPTeam explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of 101dotxyz/GPTeam. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/101dotxyz/GPTeam.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/101dotxyz/GPTeam)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/101dotxyz/GPTeam"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/101dotxyz/GPTeam.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

101dotxyz/GPTeam — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite