RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

101dotxyz/GPTeam

Default branch main · commit a216364e · scanned 5/18/2026, 9:53:21 AM

GitHub: 1,716 stars · 252 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface 101dotxyz/GPTeam, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Update the repository description to include LLM context

    Why:

    CURRENT
    GPTeam: An open-source multi-agent simulation
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    GPTeam: An open-source multi-agent simulation framework for collaborative AI agents, powered by LLMs like GPT-4.
  • hightopics#2
    Add more specific topics for LLM agent frameworks

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agents, ai, autogpt, gpt-4
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agents, ai, autogpt, gpt-4, llm-agents, multi-agent-framework, agent-orchestration, collaborative-ai
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a 'Comparison' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README titled 'Comparison with other LLM Agent Frameworks' that briefly outlines how GPTeam differs from popular alternatives like AutoGen, CrewAI, or LangChain in its approach to collaborative, hierarchical multi-agent systems.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface 101dotxyz/GPTeam
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Mesa
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Mesa · recommended 1×
  2. PIPE2 · recommended 1×
  3. CPN Tools · recommended 1×
  4. Anylogic · recommended 1×
  5. NetLogo · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I simulate multiple AI agents collaborating to achieve a shared objective?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Mesa
    2. PIPE2
    3. CPN Tools
    4. Anylogic
    5. NetLogo
    6. Gymnasium
    7. RLlib
    8. MAgent
    9. SPADE

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named 101dotxyz/GPTeam. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What open-source frameworks exist for building collaborative AI agent systems with LLMs?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AutoGen
    2. CrewAI
    3. LangChain
    4. LlamaIndex
    5. Haystack
    6. MetaGPT

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named 101dotxyz/GPTeam. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of 101dotxyz/GPTeam?
    pass
    AI named 101dotxyz/GPTeam explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts 101dotxyz/GPTeam in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named 101dotxyz/GPTeam explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo 101dotxyz/GPTeam solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named 101dotxyz/GPTeam explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of 101dotxyz/GPTeam. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/101dotxyz/GPTeam.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/101dotxyz/GPTeam)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/101dotxyz/GPTeam"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/101dotxyz/GPTeam.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

101dotxyz/GPTeam — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite