RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

RosettaCommons/RFdiffusion

Default branch main · commit 2d0c003d · scanned 6/18/2026, 9:27:11 AM

GitHub: 2,915 stars · 622 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
63 /100
Needs work
Category recall
1 / 2
Avg rank #3.0 when recommended
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface RosettaCommons/RFdiffusion, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics for protein design and scaffolding

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    protein-design, protein-scaffolding, motif-scaffolding, binder-design, diffusion-models, generative-ai, structural-biology, rosetta-commons
  • highabout#2
    Update the repository's "About" description

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Code for running RFdiffusion
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Open-source method for de novo protein structure generation, including motif scaffolding, binder design, and unconditional protein generation using diffusion models.
  • mediumreadme#3
    Clarify the project's license in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## License
This project is licensed under [Specify License(s) here, e.g., a custom Rosetta Commons license or a combination of licenses]. Please refer to the LICENSE file for full details.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
1 / 2
50% of queries surface RosettaCommons/RFdiffusion
Avg rank
#3.0
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
7%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ProteinMPNN
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ProteinMPNN · recommended 2×
  2. Rosetta · recommended 2×
  3. AlphaFold2 · recommended 1×
  4. RoseTTAFold · recommended 1×
  5. ProGen · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I generate novel protein structures from scratch or with conditional information?
    you: #3
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. AlphaFold2
    2. RoseTTAFold
    3. RFdiffusion ← you
    4. ProteinMPNN
    5. ProGen
    6. ESMFold
    7. ESM-2
    8. Rosetta
    9. Tranception
    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What open-source methods exist for designing protein binders or scaffolding specific motifs?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Rosetta
    2. AlphaFold/AlphaFold-Multimer
    3. ProteinMPNN
    4. RFdiffusion / FrameDiff
    5. PyRosetta
    6. Foldit

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named RosettaCommons/RFdiffusion. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of RosettaCommons/RFdiffusion?
    pass
    AI named RosettaCommons/RFdiffusion explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts RosettaCommons/RFdiffusion in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named RosettaCommons/RFdiffusion explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo RosettaCommons/RFdiffusion solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named RosettaCommons/RFdiffusion explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of RosettaCommons/RFdiffusion. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/RosettaCommons/RFdiffusion.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/RosettaCommons/RFdiffusion)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/RosettaCommons/RFdiffusion"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/RosettaCommons/RFdiffusion.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

RosettaCommons/RFdiffusion — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite